On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote: > > Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one > of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's > all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corroborate the > claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or something else? there's no Bourne shell in CentOS anyways, /bin/sh is a symlink to /bin/bash... last OS I can think of with an actual Bourne shell was Solaris. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz