On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote:
>>
>> Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated,
>> one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well
>> that's all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to
>> corroborate the claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or
>> something else?
>
> there's no Bourne shell in CentOS anyways, /bin/sh is a symlink to
> /bin/bash...
>
> last OS I can think of with an actual Bourne shell was Solaris.
>
>
The various *BSD's have & use the actual Bourne shell ....
--
William A. Mahaffey III
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
ever devised by man."
-- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.