[CentOS] Kernel 2.6.32-573.22.1.el6.x86_64, higher than usual load

Johnny Hughes johnny at centos.org
Fri Apr 8 13:32:52 UTC 2016


On 04/08/2016 06:50 AM, Johnny Carlsen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> After switching to the 2.6.32-573.22.1.el6.x86_64 kernel (CentOS 6) a few weeks ago I have noticed that my servers are now reporting a much higher idle load.
> 
> The servers are being monitored with Zabbix, and there is a clear difference between the older kernel 2.6.32-573.12.1 and the newer 2.6.32-573.12.1.
> 
> I can see the problem on both physical and virtual servers.
> 
> You can see the Load Average chart here from one of our servers:
> http://imgur.com/U1eihMX
> 
> The server is pretty much idle all the time, but the load average increased from 0.001 to 0.300 when updated to the new kernel.
> 
> Is anyone else seeing the same behavior?

This is one of the fixes listed on the errata page:

"Due to prematurely decremented calc_load_task, the calculated load
average was off by up to the number of CPUs in the machine. As a
consequence, job scheduling worked improperly causing a drop in the
system performance. This update keeps the delta of the CPU going into
NO_HZ idle separately, and folds the pending idle delta into the global
active countwhile correctly aging the averages for the idle-duration
when leaving NO_HZ mode. Now, job scheduling works correctly, ensuring
balanced CPU load. (BZ#1300349)"

From:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0494.html

No idea if that is impacting the load shown on your machine .. maybe
someone has some ideas.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20160408/8588e087/attachment.sig>


More information about the CentOS mailing list