[CentOS] libdrm info wrong when build with mock - test solution??

[Andreas Benzler]

Hello Phil,

the idea behind of all my private work to get centos 7 work for more as an server only system:

http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/ <http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/>

and it looks like a harmless output that can be ignored.

http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/drivers/ <http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/drivers/>
X11 and ATI (stable)

http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/mesa/ <http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/mesa/>
Mesa (11.1.2 stable)

kernel
http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/kernel/x86_64/ <http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/kernel/x86_64/>
4.4.7 lts stable

the graphical desktop runs much better.

No one of my Desktop PC around works good with the default resources. Don’t forget that centos 7 is from 2014 and
two of my machines are from 2010 and 2012.

nux-dextop gstreamer never works for me on Centos 7.2

http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/gstreamer/x86_64/ <http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/gstreamer/x86_64/>

this setup run everything that i touch in multimedia with totem.

Sources and rpm not gpg -  private server. 

Baken with Centos and epel mock

Sincerely

Andy

> Am 16.04.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Phil Wyett <philwyett at irregulars-engineering.com>:
> 
> On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 18:21 +0200, Andreas Benzler wrote:
>> Hello guys...
>> 
>> I compiled inside of "mock"
>> 
>> libdrm 2.67
>> mesa 11.2.1
>> ati 7.6.1
>> 
>> mockbuild says:
>> 
>> libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos local-drivers - OK
>> 
>> mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.centos local-mesa - OK
>> 
>> installed packaged:
>> 
>> xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64              7.6.1-1.el7.centos
>> @local-drivers OK
>> 
>> libdrm.x86_64
>> 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos OK
>> 
>> glxinfo says:
>> 
>> OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER (DRM 2.43.0, LLVM
>> 3.6.2)
>> OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 11.1.2
>> OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30
>> OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2
>> OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30
>> OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2
>> OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES
>> 3.00
>> 
>> DRM 2.43.0 ??
>> 
>> Wired...
>> 
> 
> These are not versions in CentOS (not supported). What is the source of
> these SRPMs?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Phil