[CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?
John R Pierce
pierce at hogranch.comWed Apr 27 19:13:40 UTC 2016
- Previous message: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?
 - Next message: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?
 - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
 
>>> >>last OS I can think of with an actual Bourne shell was Solaris.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>> >
>> >The various *BSD's have & use the actual Bourne shell ....
>> >
>> >
> Which one? All the BSDs I know of use the Almquist Shell except for
> OpenBSD which uses a patched version of the Public Domain Korn Shell
indeed, the man for sh(1) on freebsd 10.3 says (in part)
HISTORY
      A sh command, the Thompson	shell, appeared	in Version 1 AT&T UNIX.	 It
      was superseded in Version 7 AT&T UNIX by the Bourne shell,	which inher-
      ited the name sh.
      This version of sh	was rewritten in 1989 under the	BSD license after the
      Bourne shell from AT&T System V Release 4 UNIX.
AUTHORS
      This version of sh	was originally written by Kenneth Almquist.
-- 
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
  - Previous message: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?
 - Next message: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?
 - Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
 
More information about the CentOS mailing list