[CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?
John R Pierce
pierce at hogranch.comWed Apr 27 19:13:40 UTC 2016
- Previous message: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?
- Next message: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> >>last OS I can think of with an actual Bourne shell was Solaris. >>> >> >>> >> >> > >> >The various *BSD's have & use the actual Bourne shell .... >> > >> > > Which one? All the BSDs I know of use the Almquist Shell except for > OpenBSD which uses a patched version of the Public Domain Korn Shell indeed, the man for sh(1) on freebsd 10.3 says (in part) HISTORY A sh command, the Thompson shell, appeared in Version 1 AT&T UNIX. It was superseded in Version 7 AT&T UNIX by the Bourne shell, which inher- ited the name sh. This version of sh was rewritten in 1989 under the BSD license after the Bourne shell from AT&T System V Release 4 UNIX. AUTHORS This version of sh was originally written by Kenneth Almquist. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
- Previous message: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?
- Next message: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list