[CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?
Chris Adams
linux at cmadams.netWed Apr 27 22:18:57 UTC 2016
- Previous message: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?
- Next message: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Once upon a time, JJB <jack at internetguy.net> said: > Interesting. Back in 1980 we called /bin/sh the Mashey shell. It > did not have command substitution or other things we now take for > granted. Bourne did that for us. So there's a version or two > missing in history... Check the history here: https://github.com/dspinellis/unix-history-repo -- Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?
- Next message: [CentOS] Bourne shell deprecated?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list