On 08/02/2016 11:00 AM, Olivier BONHOMME wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 03:29:07PM +0000, Olivier BONHOMME wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 02:56:26PM +0000, Olivier BONHOMME wrote: > >> So the question is: Is that behaviour can be considered as an lftp bug or not ? > > Hello again, > > Just answering to myself and the list for a conclusion. lftp in CentOS uses the > default priority provided by gnutls and it's not possible to override it in lftp > 4.0.9 provided in CentOS 6. > > Howerver, the ssl:priority feature has been implemented in lftp 4.6.2 > (https://github.com/lavv17/lftp/commit/b406805d2b3d4c9a88e24363980e5717e61d0948) > and there is also a backport RHEL/CentOS for CentOS 7 > (https://git.centos.org/blob/rpms!lftp/373a02466b773fe2dbbfde702aec1848e006ba70/SOURCES!lftp-4.4.8-ssl-tls-restrict.patch) > > I think it could be nice if that feature could be backported into the CentOS 6 > lftp version. CentOS rebuilds the source code from RHEL-6. If anything is going to be backported, it would need to be backported into RHEL-6 and released, and we would then get it into CentOS-6. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20160802/6a4cc965/attachment-0005.sig>