[CentOS] Ordering rich rules with firewalld
Dan White
d_e_white at icloud.comFri Aug 26 17:25:46 UTC 2016
- Previous message: [CentOS] Ordering rich rules with firewalld
- Next message: [CentOS] Ordering rich rules with firewalld
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
How about http://www.firewalld.org/documentation -> firewall.direct(5) https://twoerner.fedorapeople.org/firewalld/doc/firewalld.direct.html priority="priority" The priority is used to order rules. Priority 0 means add rule on top of the chain, with a higher priority the rule will be added further down. Rules with the same priority are on the same level and the order of these rules is not fixed and may change. If you want to make sure that a rule will be added after another one, use a low priority for the first and a higher for the following. Sounds like the way to force the order. Dan White | d_e_white at icloud.com ------------------------------------------------ “Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.” (Bill Waterson: Calvin & Hobbes) On Aug 26, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Jeff White <jeff.white at wsu.edu> wrote: Is there any way to order rich rules in firewalld? If I remove all rules and add them back in firewalld seems to put them in whatever order it feels like. Alternatively, how can I change the default policy of a firewalld zone? At the moment I don't see any way to have a zone accept traffic by default other than adding a rich rule allowing 0.0.0.0/0. -- Jeff White HPC Systems Engineer Information Technology Services - WSU _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS at centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
- Previous message: [CentOS] Ordering rich rules with firewalld
- Next message: [CentOS] Ordering rich rules with firewalld
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list