On 4 Feb 2016 03:10, "Always Learning" <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 13:57 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > > > On Feb 3, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Ricardo J. Barberis <ricardo at palmtx.com.ar> wrote: > > > > > > El Miércoles 03/02/2016, Warren Young escribió: > > >> > > >> Again, I don’t know why they couldn’t just do it with links. > > > > > > I guess that's probably to execute scripts and "hide" the name of the > > > interpreter, e.g.: > > > > I get why second-rate programmers would care to do that, but what I don’t get is why systemd would need a feature to support that wish. > > Perhaps the Systemd are all 'second-rate' programmers ? Good > programmers always try to avoid the crap. > > That's enough. You've been around these lists long enough to realise attacks like that nonsense are inappropriate and won't be tolerated.