On 02/20/2016 05:41 PM, Jason Welsh wrote: > I believe it's because I'm using the 32 bit flavor of centos. Of course I > found a doc stating that right after I sent the email. > > Thanks, > Jason Yes, no SCLs for i686 only x86_64 > On Feb 20, 2016 2:18 PM, "Lamar Owen" <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > >> On 02/19/2016 08:55 PM, jason welsh wrote: >> >>> No package centos-release-SCL available. >>> Error: Nothing to do >>> monsterjam.org:/etc/letsencrypt/archive/monsterjam # cat >>> /etc/centos-release >>> CentOS release 6.7 (Final) >>> monsterjam:/etc/letsencrypt/archive/monsterjam # >>> >>> any ideas? >>> >>> Try centos-release-scl instead. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20160222/073e1f18/attachment-0004.sig>