On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 09:11 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > Definitely. But please don't show up ranting about systemd unless you > genuinely have something new and insightful to add. We have literally > been discussing moving to an improved init system since 2005: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Y6PUIY3HOPVKA5IUJQ5TL6WAVTE3G4KY/ > and in that decade, pretty much everything to be said _has_ been said > and considered. That is, we've *been through* the independent analysis > of systemd. Is systemd the beneficial, reliable, useful and workable "improved init system" or something with circa 275,000 lines of coding compared to init's circa 10,000 lines ? Things I have learned in programming include modular is better than monolithic, and less code better than M$-style bloatware which systemd appears to be. Just what is Fedora's and Red Hat's Plan B when the revolt against systemd escalates ? Whom is going to apologise for fouling-up Red Hat's EL and our beloved Centos ? -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.