[CentOS] signing RPM packages with SHA256

Johnny Hughes johnny at centos.org
Wed Jan 20 10:52:37 UTC 2016


On 01/20/2016 04:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 01/20/2016 04:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 01/20/2016 01:37 AM, Alice Wonder wrote:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> I noticed that RPM packages I sign use SHA1
>>>
>>> Signature   : RSA/SHA1, Fri 08 Jan 2016 10:50:58 AM PST, Key ID
>>> ad3b591d147abf59
>>>
>>> Signatures from CentOS 7 use SHA256
>>>
>>> Signature   : RSA/SHA256, Wed 06 Jan 2016 08:54:58 AM PST, Key ID
>>> 24c6a8a7f4a80eb5
>>>
>>> I'm trying to find where / how to use sha256 when I sign packages but I
>>> am not having much luck. Closest I have found is this :
>>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RPM_file_format_changes_to_support_SHA-256
>>>
>>> That page appears to be from 2009 and six years is a really long time,
>>> things change a lot.
>>>
>>> Is there an up to date reference somewhere on RPM package signing that I
>>> haven't stumbled upon yet?
>>>
>>> SHA1 is broken. I shouldn't be using it.
>>>
>>> CentOS 7 is all I build packages for.
>>>
>>
>> In your .rpmmacros file .. try setting:
>>
>> _binary_filedigest_algorithm SHA256
>>
>> or from the command line:
>>
>> rpm --define '_binary_filedigest_algorithm SHA256' <current_line>
>>
>> =====
>>
>> if some some reason it does not like the SAH256 value .. try 8 instead.  So:
>>
>> rpm --define '_binary_filedigest_algorithm 8'
>>
>> or in .rpmmacros:
>>
>> _binary_filedigest_algorithm 8
>>
> 
> There is another one as well:
> 
> --define "_source_filedigest_algorithm 8"
> 
> --define "_binary_filedigest_algorithm 8"
> 
> 
> Defining it in the .rpmmacros would be best .. I think otherwise you
> would need to define it in youe rpmbild line AND your rpm signature line.
> 
> Are you building your rpms in mock or from rpmbuild on the command line?
> 
> If I do this on my default c7 install, I get that as the default:
> 
> [jhughes at localhost ~]$ rpmbuild --showrc | grep filedigest_algorithm
> -14: _binary_filedigest_algorithm	8
> -14: _source_filedigest_algorithm	8
> 
> Not sure how you got it to do it in SHA1 :)

One last thought .. are you using something like:

--force-v3-sigs

in your signing command line?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20160120/fb7db0b1/attachment.sig>


More information about the CentOS mailing list