Thanks very much all for the responses Apologies for delayed had a back injury keeping afk Definitely have some food for thought thanks all again On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Anthony K <akcentos at anroet.com> wrote: > On 16/06/16 13:18, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> >> .. the actual definition of a >> 'CRITICAL' update from Red Hat's perspective is: >> >> "This rating is given to flaws that could be easily*exploited by a remote >> unauthenticated attacker and lead to system compromise (arbitrary code >> execution) without requiring user interaction*. These are the types >> of vulnerabilities that can be exploited by worms. Flaws that require an >> authenticated remote user, a local user, or an unlikely configuration >> are not classed as Critical impact." >> >> Taken from: >> https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification >> > > I think it's time to add a another link to the mailman suffix. > > That bold section should scare anyone storing public data on their servers > without keeping up with security updates whether critical or not! I'd say > that whole paragraph needs to be added to the Wiki somewhere and the email > suffix modified to include a link to it. This would give us a place to > point people to - such as - *S**ee link at bottom of signature, you <insert > what you feel necessary here>*. > > > ak. > > > PS: Here's what my suggestion might look like: > <new_sig> > ---------- > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Latest CentOS Release - 7.v.wxyz - > https://wiki.centos.org/read-this-if-centos-version-not-at-7.v.wxyz > </new_sig> > > And just as Johnny said - but what the heck do I know? > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >