[CentOS] Pulling in broadwell support for cent6u5

[jsl6uy js16uy]

Thanks very much all for the responses
Apologies for delayed had a back injury keeping afk
Definitely have some food for thought

thanks all again

On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Anthony K <akcentos at anroet.com> wrote:

> On 16/06/16 13:18, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>>
>>   .. the actual definition of a
>> 'CRITICAL' update from Red Hat's perspective is:
>>
>> "This rating is given to flaws that could be easily*exploited by a remote
>> unauthenticated attacker and lead to system compromise (arbitrary code
>> execution) without requiring user interaction*. These are the types
>> of vulnerabilities that can be exploited by worms. Flaws that require an
>> authenticated remote user, a local user, or an unlikely configuration
>> are not classed as Critical impact."
>>
>> Taken from:
>> https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification
>>
>
> I think it's time to add a another link to the mailman suffix.
>
> That bold section should scare anyone storing public data on their servers
> without keeping up with security updates whether critical or not!  I'd say
> that whole paragraph needs to be added to the Wiki somewhere and the email
> suffix modified to include a link to it.  This would give us a place to
> point people to - such as - *S**ee link at bottom of signature, you <insert
> what you feel necessary here>*.
>
>
> ak.
>
>
> PS: Here's what my suggestion might look like:
> <new_sig>
> ----------
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> Latest CentOS Release - 7.v.wxyz -
> https://wiki.centos.org/read-this-if-centos-version-not-at-7.v.wxyz
> </new_sig>
>
> And just as Johnny said - but what the heck do I know?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>