actually that isn't true either. Just install a newer version of
firefox or chrome or whatever..then you are independent of the operating
system in many cases.
On 3/26/2016 9:00 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 25.03.2016 17:29, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>> @Eero: IMHO you are missing some points here. There are more and more
>>> browsers that are unable to use SSL{2,3} as well as TLS1.0, not just
>>> disabled via config, but this decission was made at compile time.
>>> Newer Android and Apple-iOS devices for example.
>>>
>>>
>> This is not true. it works fine with latest android and ios. I just tested
>> it.
> The latest version of Android is Marshmallow and currently is only
> installed on 2.3% of the devices out there:
> http://developer.android.com/about/dashboards/index.html
>
> You cannot just support the latest version of a client if your site is
> accessed by regular users out there.
>
>>> And the point is not that the site supports TLS1.0, but that it does
>>> not support TLS1.1 and/or TLS 1.2, and as such is incassessible
>>> to devices that ask for TLS1.1 as minimum for HTTPS.
>>>
>>> But that is for the admins/webmasters of the servers to resolve.
>>
>> Many sites are still using centos 5 and clones and cannot support tls 1.2
>> and tls 1.1 without upgrade.
> Then they might be forced to upgrade to a newer CentOS version. If you
> only run your personal blog then you can of course whatever you want but
> if you run a commercial site then the OS you can run depends on what the
> clients support and not the other way around.
>
> Regards,
> Dennis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos