[CentOS] Internal RAID controllers question
Gordon Messmer
gordon.messmer at gmail.comMon May 9 20:03:36 UTC 2016
- Previous message: [CentOS] Internal RAID controllers question
- Next message: [CentOS] Internal RAID controllers question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 05/09/2016 11:46 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Yes, ZFS, and thanks a lot! For distributed file system "brick" boxes ZFS > (btrfs,...) may be a must, but only if distributed filesystem doesn't have > its own mechanism ensuring file integrity, right? Ignore distributed filesystems for a moment. Is there any application for which want to allow your computer to silently corrupt your data? My email archive consists of messages in individual files (Maildir), and I'd like to ensure that bits don't flip. I'd like to ensure that bits don't flip in my music files, creating noise during playback (one corrupt sample could end up being pure noise played back at maximum volume). Even for very basic, relatively unimportant purposes, I want my data in a reliable filesystem.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Internal RAID controllers question
- Next message: [CentOS] Internal RAID controllers question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list