On 05/12/2016 03:28 AM, aswathi.ok at accenture.com wrote: > Hi Team, > > I have a centos 7 running server with openssl version openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.4.x86_64, I have received a set of vulnerability from security team, can anyone tell me as per below CVE do I need to update my openssl version to 1.0.1t? Or the current version which we have is safe. > > CVE-2016-0701, CVE-2015-3197 > > CVE-2015-4000 > > CVE-2015-0204 > > CVE-2015-0286, CVE-2015-0287, CVE-2015-0289, CVE-2015-0293, CVE-2015-0209, CVE-2015-0288 > > CVE-2015-0292, CVE-2014-8176 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-0701 substitute the other CVE numbers for the rest, also: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3197 (and so on) So, Red Hat says CVE-2016-0701 does not impact any releases (no updates), and if you look at the CVE-2015-3197, it lists all the applicable updates. If you check all the CVE's in question, you can find out all your answers. CentOS has a CentOS-announce mailing list where you can see our released updates: https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/ For example, CVE-2015-3197 lists 'RHSA-2016:0301' on '2016-03-01', so to see if CentOS released an update .. click on the March 2016 link and then you will see this: https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2016-March/thread.html And on that page, you can find 2016:0301 for CentOS-6 .. it leads to this link: https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2016-March/021712.html So, if you have openssl-1.0.1e-42.el6_7.4 or later, it has the changes rolled in for that CVE, etc. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20160512/e2edf015/attachment-0004.sig>