On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net > wrote: > > > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100 > > From: isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> > > > > Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux? > > > > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html > > > > I can't get it to work on CentOS 6.8, ff 45.3.0-1, all x86_64. ff's > > pluginreg.dat shows the plugin is [INVALID], which is often a sign > > of bitness-mismatch, but that's not the case here. > > > > $ tail -n 3 pluginreg.dat > > [INVALID] > > /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so:$ > > 1474541270000:$ > > $ file /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so > > /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared > > object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, stripped $ > > strings /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so | grep > > FlashPlayer_23 FlashPlayer_23_0_0_179_FlashPlayer > > $ rpm -q firefox > > firefox-45.3.0-1.el6.centos.x86_64 > > $ > > > > I have it working on a different Linux system, not CentOS, with ff > > 48.0.1. > > > > I've been using it -- currently ..._179 -- (sparingly) on a -7 > machine with the default (firefox-45.3.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64) ff. > > Looks like it's compiled against a later version of glibc: > ldd libflashplayer.so | grep "not found" ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `./libflashplayer.so' ./libflashplayer.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by ./libflashplayer.so) ./libflashplayer.so: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./libflashplayer.so) ./libflashplayer.so: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./libflashplayer.so) -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu