On 4/10/2017 1:57 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > In what universe are those "consistant" device names, as opposed to > eth[0...]? And how could it help automated scripts that you can run on > *any* system you're administering? if I have a Intel gigE interface and a Marvell 10g interfaces, which one is eth0 and why? Say its Intel on eth0 and Marvell on eth1, if I then add another intel, is the Marvell now eth2 ? -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz