https://www.openca.org/ might fit my needs. On 04/14/2017 06:29 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > Hello list, > > I'm contemplating running my own CA to implement the new proposed ISP > for validation of S/MIME certificates via DANE. > > I already use self-signed for my MX servers (with 3 1 1 dane records on > TCP port 25) but I don't want to use self-signed for S/MIME for user > specific x.509 certs because > > A) That's potentially a lot of DNS records > B) That requires a hash of the e-mail addresses in DNS > > Instead, I will be using a wildcard in DNS with an intermediary that > signs the user x.509 certificates. > > Using an intermediary to sign their certificates though means I can't > just revoke their certificates by removing the DNS certificate, I'll > need to provide an OCSP server for when one of their private keys gets > compromised. > > I found > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Certificate_System/8.1/html/Deploy_and_Install_Guide/install-oscp.html > but it looks like that is intended for enterprise, more complex than I > need. > > Anyone know of a good simple script for providing OCSP ?? > > -=- > > Not relevant to question but just important for me to note, I will *not* > be asking people to install my root certificate in their e-mail clients. > I think it is a bad practice to get users in the habit of installing > root certificates. > > I think the PKI system has way way way to many root certificates as it > is. I want a world where DANE validates most certificates, and only a > few root certificates are needed for things like banks where EV > certificates are a must. > > DANE as a way to validate S/MIME I think will be a godsend to e-mail > security, I hope clients implement it. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos