[CentOS] Need a bit of 'archeocomputing' help on CentOS 7.
Lamar Owen
lowen at pari.edu
Sat Apr 22 18:18:13 UTC 2017
On 04/22/2017 11:24 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Obviously, the system is designed for this - but why is nobody doing this for Linux?
The time commitment necessary to keep up with the sometimes dramatic
changes in the typical Linux distribution is very large; I would guess
that's the reason it's not typically done.
The LinuxTech EL6 libc5 is only possible because Mandriva 2011 contained
it. I've not tested that piece yet, but plan to a bit later.
> I just looked it up:
> FreeBSD 4.0 was released over 17 years ago, around the same time as RHL 6.2…
>
Yep, and the binaries I have are older than that. The particular setup
being used actually dates from 1997, almost exactly 20 years ago. The
version was upgraded a few times afterwards; the timestamps on the
original distribution archive for the glibc 2.1 version are all from May
12, 1999, but the original version was from fall of 1996.
I'm glad I held those two tarballs back all these years.
In any case, CentOS 2.1 plus the RHL 6.2 compat-glibc-2.1 packages have
the system back up and running. and running fast.
The host is CentOS 7.3.1611 using bridged networking for KVM. So far
it's running well.
More information about the CentOS
mailing list