[CentOS] Need a bit of 'archeocomputing' help on CentOS 7.

Lamar Owen lowen at pari.edu
Sat Apr 22 18:18:13 UTC 2017


On 04/22/2017 11:24 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Obviously, the system is designed for this - but why is nobody doing this for Linux?

The time commitment necessary to keep up with the sometimes dramatic 
changes in the typical Linux distribution is very large; I would guess 
that's the reason it's not typically done.

The LinuxTech EL6 libc5 is only possible because Mandriva 2011 contained 
it.  I've not tested that piece yet, but plan to a bit later.

> I just looked it up:
> FreeBSD 4.0 was released over 17 years ago, around the same time as RHL 6.2…
>
Yep, and the binaries I have are older than that.  The particular setup 
being used actually dates from 1997, almost exactly 20 years ago.  The 
version was upgraded a few times afterwards; the timestamps on the 
original distribution archive for the glibc 2.1 version are all from May 
12, 1999, but the original version was from fall of 1996.

I'm glad I held those two tarballs back all these years.

In any case, CentOS 2.1 plus the RHL 6.2 compat-glibc-2.1 packages have 
the system back up and running. and running fast.

The host is CentOS 7.3.1611 using bridged networking for KVM.  So far 
it's running well.






More information about the CentOS mailing list