[CentOS] Btrfs going forward, was: Errors on an SSD drive
Gordon Messmer
gordon.messmer at gmail.comFri Aug 11 18:21:56 UTC 2017
- Previous message: [CentOS] Btrfs going forward, was: Errors on an SSD drive
- Next message: [CentOS] Btrfs going forward, was: Errors on an SSD drive
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 08/11/2017 10:52 AM, hw wrote: > Software RAID with mdadm is a bad idea because it comes with quite > some performance loss. That's not usually the case in my experience. Battery-backed write caches make benchmarks like bonnie++ look amazing, but in real workloads I typically see better performance from md RAID.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Btrfs going forward, was: Errors on an SSD drive
- Next message: [CentOS] Btrfs going forward, was: Errors on an SSD drive
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list