On 12/20/17 03:32, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 12/19/2017 02:57 PM, Manish Jain wrote: >> >> >> On 12/20/17 01:45, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> Manish Jain wrote: >>>> >>>> On 12/19/17 22:11, Manish Jain wrote: >>>>> On 12/19/17 22:07, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 02:54:36PM +0000, Manish Jain wrote: >>>>>>> I uninstalled the old TV, and installed the version you indicated, but >>>>>>> I >>>>>>> get nothing at all: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /home/bourne # teamviewer >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Init... >>>>>>> CheckCPU: SSE2 support: yes >>>>>>> Checking setup... >>>>>>> Launching TeamViewer ... >>>>>>> Launching TeamViewer GUI ... >>>>>>> /home/bourne # >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I deleted ~/.config/teamviewer* and ~/.local/share/teamviewer*, but >>>>>>> still no luck. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is it possible that this has something to do with Centos 7 running as >>>>>>> a >>>>>>> vm (under VirtualBox) in my box ? (But then, Manjaro vm works fine). >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe you have a customized $PS1 (or other shell) but with a shell >>>>>> prompt that includes '#', it makes me wonder if you're running this as >>>>>> the logged-into-X user or as root? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Jonathan, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for joining the thread. >>>>> >>>>> I am doing this as a normal user (bourne), logged in with xfce4. >>>> >>>> I recreated the vm - this time letting the TV rpm pull in all its deps. >>>> But the situation remains the same - No TV window from teamviewer. >>>> >>> Have you tried looking in either ~/.xsession-errors or /var/log/Xorg.0.log? >> >> >> Hi Mark, >> >> Thanks for replying. >> >> There is no ~/.xsession-errors, and the only X log /var/log/Xorg.0.log >> shows no errors whatever. >> >> I can - if it helps - post the output of 'strace teamviewer' - but it >> would be huge. >> > > Is there a reason why you picked a non standard graphical system for centos? > > since this seems to use qt5 .. I would try installing KDE (KDE is on my > laptop .. but I use gnome and was logged in via gnome when it worked). > > There is likely something that is part of GDM / Gnome / KDE that the > package needs which is not installed in xfce. That would be my bet. That is my guess too as of now. I set up a minimal system because I like to build up my system using nuts-and-bolts. Since that did not work well, I have flagged off the DVD download, and shall use KDE this time around. If K does not salvage the situation, I will post a new message to the forum. Thanks & Regards, Manish Jain