On 2/22/2017 1:16 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > a) Please don't top post. > b) 'T'ain't funny, McGee. They don't have the budget, and they need this > server*now*... it's one of their compute nodes, and at least one person > is dead in the water. you can't afford a replacement for a 6-8 year old server (new in 2009), yet someone who is presumably being paid is not able to work. whats that costing? -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz