[CentOS] firewalld
TE Dukes
tdukes at palmettoshopper.com
Sat Jan 28 12:01:16 UTC 2017
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of James
> Hogarth
> Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 4:18 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewalld
>
> On 28 Jan 2017 3:02 am, "TE Dukes" <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Gordon
> > Messmer
> > Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 9:23 PM
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewalld
> >
> > On 01/27/2017 06:01 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
> > > I telnet localhost 143, I get connection refused.
> > >
> > > What zone is used for the local network and what zone is used for
> > > outside access?
> >
> > All traffic from localhost is allowed. No zone is involved.
> >
> > The zone for "outside" access depends on which interface receives the
> > packet, and what zone you've put that interface in. I believe that
> defaults to
> > "public."
>
> I'm telneting in from ssh on a machine on the local network, still
getting
> connection refused.
>
> The zone apparently means something because an interface can only be on
> one.
> Moving it to a different zone results in the same error (same
services/ports
> opened in each zone).
>
> I may as well disable firewalld and let my router handle the firewall.
>
> I don't plan to use my server as a workstation.
>
>
> Have a read through this and then decide on if you want to use it or not.
>
> You can also switch to iptables-service and mask firewalld if you want the
> same behaviour as in C6.
>
> 7.3 also has nftables as a tech preview, but I've not finished my article
on that
> yet.
I saw something about that somewhere.
Did you forget a link?
Thanks
More information about the CentOS
mailing list