[CentOS] Physically moving a mail server vs. cached DNS
Nicolas Kovacs
info at microlinux.frSat Jul 1 09:37:39 UTC 2017
- Previous message: [CentOS] Physically moving a mail server vs. cached DNS
- Next message: [CentOS] Physically moving a mail server vs. cached DNS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Le 01/07/2017 à 11:00, Pete Biggs a écrit : > That is controlled by the TTL (time to live) entry. A DNS server must > refresh it's cache within the TTL for the entry. Using the '-a' option > to host will give you more information: So I would have to use the -a option with the old DNS server, to know their TTL. I'm also wondering if some DNS server don't override the TTL and keep the information longer. I remember such a case where the DNS server of the french provider Orange kept a stale DNS information forever.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Physically moving a mail server vs. cached DNS
- Next message: [CentOS] Physically moving a mail server vs. cached DNS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list