On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:12:17 +0200 wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: > Hello James, > > > On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:06:59 +0000 James Pearson <james-p at moving-picture.com> wrote: > > > wwp wrote: > > >>> > > >>> They obviously felt more comfortable instead released the older one on > > >>> EL6 this cycle, but I suspect that the newer 52.x ESR version will be > > >>> released during the next cycle. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> Indeed, the latest RHEL 6 update for firefox is the 52.1.0 ESR release: > > >> > > >> This update upgrades Firefox to version 52.1.0 ESR. > > > > > > Sorry for jumping into this topic from nowhere.. does this mean that we > > > could get a Firefox v52 running on a CentOS 6? > > > > Yes, not 'could' but 'will' ... > > Hah. Good news! In fact, not really good news. Firefox 52 is damn slow compared to 45. Every major upgrade shows a slower Firefox, what's wrong w/ it? Regards, -- wwp -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20170503/d19f86fe/attachment-0004.sig>