[CentOS] cyrus spool on btrfs?
Johnny Hughes
johnny at centos.orgFri Sep 8 19:39:31 UTC 2017
- Previous message: [CentOS] cyrus spool on btrfs?
- Next message: [CentOS] cyrus spool on btrfs?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 09/07/2017 12:57 PM, hw wrote: > > Hi, > > is there anything that speaks against putting a cyrus mail spool onto a > btrfs subvolume? This is what Red Hat says about btrfs: The Btrfs file system has been in Technology Preview state since the initial release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6. Red Hat will not be moving Btrfs to a fully supported feature and it will be removed in a future major release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The Btrfs file system did receive numerous updates from the upstream in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 and will remain available in the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 series. However, this is the last planned update to this feature. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20170908/f90545f6/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] cyrus spool on btrfs?
- Next message: [CentOS] cyrus spool on btrfs?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list