On 11 Apr 2018 09:48 Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 11/04/18 13:58, James Hogarth wrote: > > For those not aware ansible has been deprecated in RHEL7 from the extras > > repository. > > > > In the RHEL specific world it's now in an optional "product" (basically an > > optional subscription) that is part of any RHEL subscription, but it's opt > > in. > > > > As a result ansible is back in the EPEL7 repository for 2.5.0+ , having > > been removed for ansible 2.4.2 when it got introduced to the RHEL extras > > repo. > > > > I have no idea what, if anything, the CentOS team will do with the ansible > > in the CentOS7 extras repository. > > That's a good question, as "orphaning" it would be an issue for all > people now getting it directly from Extras, if they don't have epel > added (also "opt-in") > > AFAICS, nothing is pushed to git.centos.org anymore for it : > https://git.centos.org/summary/rpms!ansible.git > > So I guess it would be a question for the centos-devel list : > - either we orphan it (and the other pkgs required for it) from extras > - or we try to build those and continue to provide ansible Does it really matter which repo it comes from? I would expect the users of ansible to be smart enough to get it from epel or extras. As long as we know how to get it I do not see this as a big deal. It seems that since it is already being built for EPEL, that would be the path of least resistance for the Centos devs. Just my $.02 Regards, -- Tom me at tdiehl.org