On 12/21/18 10:25 AM, mark wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> On 12/20/18 10:33 AM, mark wrote: >>> lejeczek via CentOS wrote: >>>> I wonder if any Centosian here have done something different than >>>> only contemplated using Fedora Server, actually worked on it in >>>> test/production envs. >>>> >>>> If here are some folks who have done it I want to ask if you deem it >>>> to be a viable option to put it on at least portion of servers stack. >>>> >>>> Anybody? >>>> >>>> >>> I would not run it as a server. In a server and workstation >>> environment, you do *not* want to have daily multiple updates to >>> software, you want stability, or you're likely to have your users >>> seriously aggravated by you, for breaking their jobs far too frequently. >> Where do you get that with Fedora server you have to do daily multiple >> updates? >> > I frequently see my manager's fedora box doing updates, multiple times a > week. Yes, updates come out practically every day. So? Microsoft sends out updates to its desktops practically every day also. I turned off auto updates on my Fedora notebook and tend to do them Monday mornings to start the new week 'up to date'. I have NOT turned off auto updates on the Win7 systems here, as otherwise I might just forget as I use them too infrequently myself. Tracer is an interesting tool to see, after an update, what you have to restart. Sometimes just an app or a logout and back in. Sometimes a reboot.