[CentOS] [Fwd: Centos 7.6 and Aeskulap]

[Gregory P. Ennis]

On 12/28/18 6:38 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> 
> > I tried to compile aeskulap on Centos 7.6 by using the commands ./configure followed by
> > make which resulted in the following errors :
> 
> Attempting to build this way is next to pointless and will likely show
> you errors completely unrelated to why the package won't properly build.
> 
> > make[4]: *** [dimoimg.o] Error 1
> > make[4]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-
> > beta1/dcmtk/dcmimgle/libsrc'
> > make[3]: *** [libsrc-all] Error 2
> > make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-beta1/dcmtk/dcmimgle'
> > make[2]: *** [dcmimgle-libsrc-all] Error 2
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-beta1/dcmtk'
> > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-beta1'
> > make: *** [all] Error 2
> 
> ...and even if you were building it correctly you completely skipped the
> actual errors here.  What you've shown can't be used in any significant
> way to help.
> 
> > I downloaded the source files from :
> > 
> > http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/dextop/el7/SRPMS/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.17beta1.el7.nux.src.rpm
> 
> As you've already stated and shown here this is a package from a
> 3rd-party repo, and as such is not supported by the CentOS project.  If
> Nux can't help you then I suggest you look for the package elsewhere or
> try to (properly) build it yourself.  Unfortunately neither of these
> options is supported here.

I was going to give it a shot but there are three build dependencies not 
part of CentOS 7 / EPEL 7

dcmtk-devel
gconfmm26-devel
libglademm24-devel

When that starts to happen, it often results in needing additional 
dependencies to build those, etc.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alice,

Thanks much for trying.  Your observation was the same as mine.  I installed the above
dependencies without a problem, they were all in the repops.  After I installed them it
still failed to compile with the final result being the errors that I posted earlier.

I am not wanting to convert these desktops to Fedora 29, but at least I have a path for
what is needed.

If any of the other users on the list have ideas of what has happened to Centos 7.6 I would
surely appreciate a solution.

Greg