On 07/18/2018 09:37 AM, Matthew Phelps wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 6:55 PM Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >> On 07/17/2018 05:51 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/15/2018 03:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS < >> centos at centos.org >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr>: >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 15/07/2018 à 19:49, Matthew Phelps a écrit : >>>>>>> This is a known issue. See >>>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 for a patch to >> the >>>>>>> /usr/bin/firefox wrapper script. >>>>>> >>>>>> On a side note, I've been using Firefox since version 0.99 around >> 2003, >>>>>> when it wasn't even called Firefox but something like Firebird or >>>>> Phoenix. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Netscape? :-) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I've tested this new version, and I'm seriously considering moving to >> a >>>>>> different browser. Over the years, I have developed a zero tolerance >>>>>> policy for applications that have to be potty-trained again at every >>>>>> major release. >>>>> >>>>> Why not directing this to somewhere under https://lists.mozilla.org/ >>>>> listinfo ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Now I'm hesitating between Seamonkey browser + mail or the >>>>>> Chromium/Thunderbird pair. My only issue is getting Seamonkey mail >>>>>> synchronized with my OwnCloud contacts. >>>>> >>>>> This (tampering) is symptomatic for the current state of linux as a >>>>> work-/desktopstation. >>> >>>> >>>> I'm having the same problem as stated in the original thread -- re >> saving >>>> images. BAH! >>>> >>>> Also, I can't seem to "undo" the fonts FF 60.1 wants to use and I'll >>>> invietigate that further at some point. >>>> >>>> So far, I am not happy with this new version. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> You would like it even less if you had to build all the toolsets to get >>> it to build in the first place :) >>> >>> >> >> The good news seems to be that so far all the bugs found are also >> upstream (redhat source) bugs and not introduced by the CentOS build >> process .. so they are being worked on upstream. >> >> >> > Update is out now upstream: > > https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2218 > > I am building it now .. this build should be straight forward and released in a couple of hours (after build, sign, and passing our CI Suite t_functional (https://ci.centos.org/view/CentOS-Core/). All the build requirements are the same that are already in place for the last Firefox 60 build. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20180718/7ab5870a/attachment-0005.sig>