[CentOS] ZFS on Linux repository
vychytraly at gmail.com
Tue Jul 3 17:37:19 UTC 2018
But besides this issue it was in my experience rock solid.
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 3:40 PM Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote:
> Watch out, ZFS on Linux is not as good as on FreeBSD/Solaris.
> Just recently there was an issue with data loss.
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gionatan Danti" <g.danti at assyoma.it>
> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org>
> > Sent: Monday, 25 June, 2018 22:19:22
> > Subject: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux repository
> > Hi list,
> > we all know why ZFS is not included in RHEL/CentOS distributions: its
> > CDDL license is/seems not compatible with GPL license.
> > I'm not a layer, and I do not have any strong opinion on the matter.
> > However, as a sysadmin, I found ZFS to be extremely useful, especially
> > considering BTRFS sad state. I would *really* love to have ZFS on Linux
> > more intergrated with current CentOS.
> > From what I know (and I can go wrong, obviously), while the incompatible
> > licenses prevent CentOS from shipping it, nothing should prevent to have
> > a package for enabling *its repository*, better yet the kmod-enabled
> > one. I was thiking to something as a ZFS SIG, where we can simply issue
> > "yum install zfs-sig" and have the correct kmod-enabled repository
> > enabled.
> > I searched the list but I did not found anything regarding native ZFS.
> > Any feedback on the matter is welcomed. Thanks.
> > --
> > Danti Gionatan
> > Supporto Tecnico
> > Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
> > email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info at assyoma.it
> > GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS at centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
More information about the CentOS