But besides this issue it was in my experience rock solid. On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 3:40 PM Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > Watch out, ZFS on Linux is not as good as on FreeBSD/Solaris. > Just recently there was an issue with data loss. > https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/7401 > > hth > Lucian > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Gionatan Danti" <g.danti at assyoma.it> > > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > > Sent: Monday, 25 June, 2018 22:19:22 > > Subject: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux repository > > > Hi list, > > we all know why ZFS is not included in RHEL/CentOS distributions: its > > CDDL license is/seems not compatible with GPL license. > > > > I'm not a layer, and I do not have any strong opinion on the matter. > > However, as a sysadmin, I found ZFS to be extremely useful, especially > > considering BTRFS sad state. I would *really* love to have ZFS on Linux > > more intergrated with current CentOS. > > > > From what I know (and I can go wrong, obviously), while the incompatible > > licenses prevent CentOS from shipping it, nothing should prevent to have > > a package for enabling *its repository*, better yet the kmod-enabled > > one. I was thiking to something as a ZFS SIG, where we can simply issue > > "yum install zfs-sig" and have the correct kmod-enabled repository > > enabled. > > > > I searched the list but I did not found anything regarding native ZFS. > > Any feedback on the matter is welcomed. Thanks. > > > > -- > > Danti Gionatan > > Supporto Tecnico > > Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it > > email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info at assyoma.it > > GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8 > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS at centos.org > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >