On 06/21/2018 05:09 AM, John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Toralf Lund wrote: > >> I known that I might use mount.cifs and related "fstab" entries as an >> alternative, but its password handling seems a lot less convenient. > > If you're in an AD environment, you can probably do nicely with > mount.cifs: > sec=krb5,multiuser > That way you don't have to deal with usernames/passwords at all. Interesting. Seems like a lot of setup, but it's interesting. I didn't know SMB supported this: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/279183