[CentOS] Updated krb5 rpm package altered existing krb5.conf - No go

me at tdiehl.org me at tdiehl.org
Mon Jun 18 14:33:48 UTC 2018


On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, G?tz Reinicke wrote:

>
>
>> Am 15.06.2018 um 01:04 schrieb Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>:
>>
>> On 06/14/2018 09:30 AM, me at tdiehl.org wrote:
>>> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Richard Grainger wrote:
>>>
>>>> I looked at the spec file in the source RPM for the krb5-libs package
>>>> and it it has the correct %config(noreplace) directive next to that
>>>> file in the %files section, so this is mysterious.
>>>
>>> I too can confirm this behavior.
>>
>> # rpm -qa krb\* --triggers
>> triggerun scriptlet (using /bin/sh) -- krb5-libs < 1.15.1-13
>> if ! grep -q 'includedir /etc/krb5.conf.d' /etc/krb5.conf ; then
>>     sed -i '1i # Other applications require this directory to perform krb5 configuration.\nincludedir /etc/krb5.conf.d/\n' /etc/krb5.conf
>> fi
>>
>>
>> Looks like that's the culprit.
>
>
> Good to know, but writing a rpmnew or rpmsave file would be nice to check against the life used file.

Agreed! IMO this is a packaging bug. Triggers do not drop rpmsave files. I suspect the chances of getting
Red Hat to fix it are slim to none. Fixing it would most likely break other things for them.

>
> The samba people are aware of that problem regarding the include line and are working on a patch ? the support at SerNet told me.

I agree they are aware of it but I suspect it is a low priority thing given
they have known about this since 2016-12-29.

I do think it would be relatively easy for SerNet to patch around in their
paid for rpms. alas I do not have the budget for them. :-(

The bug is available at https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12488

Regards,

-- 
Tom			me at tdiehl.org



More information about the CentOS mailing list