Steven Tardy wrote: > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:57 AM hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > >> Apparently Cisco can do it: >> >> >> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/wireless-location-appliance/product_data_sheet0900aecd80293728.html > > > I was going to mention Cisco WCS which uses wireless “controllers” and > “lightweight” access points, but seems you’ve found it. Personally used > Cisco WCS a decade ago . . . being able to give law enforcement a detailed > map of a building (from autocad file) with a potential stolen wireless > device triangulated within 5 feet is pretty impressive. > > Don’t know if this can handle all of your other/security/guest requirements > but can 100% handle physical location. So it would actually work, that´s good to know, thanks :) Beyond their access points and the controller and a support contract, is there anything else we would have to get from Cisco to get this to work? To me, Cisco is basically out of the question because you can´t even get a firmware image for a new device that arrives DOA because the firmware image is damaged without having a support contract with them. That shows they do not stand behind their products, and they are on the no-buy list. That doesn´t even consider the question of how to get a contract and how much it would cost. They didn´t even tell me that much. However, it might be a solution, so I have to bring it to consideration. >> >> <https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/wireless-location-appliance/product_data_sheet0900aecd80293728.html> > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >