[CentOS] How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?
Nicolas Kovacs
info at microlinux.frMon Mar 26 09:59:06 UTC 2018
- Previous message: [CentOS] How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?
- Next message: [CentOS] How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Le 26/03/2018 à 10:28, isdtor a écrit : > In my opionion, there is a serious gap in this area. It's either NIS, > simple, easy to setup yet insecure, or LDAP/FreeIPA/RH Id management > server at a complexity at least one order of magnitude beyond NIS. I gave FreeIPA a spin a while back. I installed it on a sandbox server, and from what I recall, it pulled in a tsunami of dependencies, and first thing it wanted to replace my Dnsmasq with BIND... so I didn't look much further. -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr Mail : info at microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
- Previous message: [CentOS] How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?
- Next message: [CentOS] How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list