Bingo - I was close, was header related, just not pkgconfig related. https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/commit/2c36dabbeef72e2d9c9697e6dcc5c67fd0a912dd On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 10:15 PM Michael Peters <pipfroschpress at gmail.com> wrote: > Okay looks like uv.h is in /usr/include - I didn't catch that until > reading the message. So the pkgconfig file is likely correct and not a bug. > Probably then a bug in the makefile for what I'm building (newer cmake - > bootstrap builds, it's post bootstrap that fails) > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 9:48 PM Michael Peters <pipfroschpress at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> EPEL package but I think there's a packaging bug, thought I would ask >> here. Trying to build something that requires libuv-devel - it finds the >> .so but can't determine version. >> >> header files are in /usr/include/uv however the pkgconfig file specifies >> /usr/include as the include directory. >> >> The pkgconfig file also has the version so I'm not sure why the make file >> can't determine version, but maybe it is trying to get version from a >> header and looking in /usr/include instead of /usr/include/uv because the >> pkgconfig file doesn't specify the subdirectory? >> >> Other devel packages with header files in sub directory or /usr/include >> do list the sub directory in the pkgconfig file, so I think there might be >> a bug in that pkgconfig file because it doesn't? >> >> [alice at localhost ~]$ rpm -ql libuv-devel |grep include >> /usr/include/uv >> /usr/include/uv.h >> /usr/include/uv/errno.h >> /usr/include/uv/linux.h >> /usr/include/uv/threadpool.h >> /usr/include/uv/unix.h >> /usr/include/uv/version.h >> [alice at localhost ~]$ grep "include" /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/libuv.pc >> includedir=/usr/include >> Cflags: -I${includedir} >> >> I can file the bug report with EPEL (Fedora I think is where?) but don't >> want to if that isn't really a bug. >> >> Thank you for feedback. >> >> -- >> *Notice*: Gmail is owned by Google, a company that made its fortune in >> content indexing and user tracking. It is logical therefore to assume that >> Google and quite possibly the government has access to any correspondence >> made with this account. >> >> Do not use correspondence with this account for sensitive information. >> > > > -- > *Notice*: Gmail is owned by Google, a company that made its fortune in > content indexing and user tracking. It is logical therefore to assume that > Google and quite possibly the government has access to any correspondence > made with this account. > > Do not use correspondence with this account for sensitive information. > -- *Notice*: Gmail is owned by Google, a company that made its fortune in content indexing and user tracking. It is logical therefore to assume that Google and quite possibly the government has access to any correspondence made with this account. Do not use correspondence with this account for sensitive information.