On Monday 28 January 2019 12:23:25 Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > > Am 28.01.2019 um 10:50 schrieb Peter Eckel <lists at eckel-edv.de>: > > I used Bacula before I switched to Bareos. > > > > There was a point, however, when the open source release of Bacula > > became, to put it mildly, a bit too inactive for my taste. > > Inactive? Every 2 months a release (average): > > https://sourceforge.net/p/bacula/mailman/bacula-announce/ I am a long time user of Bacula (Fedora 9) but I must admit that I do not keep up with versions. (I'm still running the F9 Bacula 5.2 director). What real world benefits would I get from upgrading to the current Bacula version? What problems woudl I have? What are the arguments for/against Bareos? My storage servers range from F9 to C7 and all work fine. I'm still using the old WinBacula clients even with the new Win10 boxes.