[CentOS] Centos 7 and backup solution

[Gary Stainburn]

On Monday 28 January 2019 12:23:25 Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
> > Am 28.01.2019 um 10:50 schrieb Peter Eckel <lists at eckel-edv.de>:

> > I used Bacula before I switched to Bareos.
> >
> > There was a point, however, when the open source release of Bacula
> > became, to put it mildly, a bit too inactive for my taste.
>
> Inactive? Every 2 months a release (average):
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/bacula/mailman/bacula-announce/

I am a long time user of Bacula (Fedora 9) but I must admit that I do not keep 
up with versions. (I'm still running the F9 Bacula 5.2 director).

What real world benefits would I get from upgrading to the current Bacula 
version?  What problems woudl I have? What are the arguments for/against 
Bareos?

My storage servers range from F9 to C7 and all work fine. 
I'm still using the old WinBacula clients even with the new Win10 boxes.