[CentOS] Bacula 9.4.1 Dbdriver issue

Thu Jan 31 08:56:49 UTC 2019
Alessandro Baggi <alessandro.baggi at gmail.com>

Il 28/01/19 12:53, J. Echter ha scritto:
> Am 25.01.19 um 13:13 schrieb Alessandro Baggi:
>> Hi list,
>> I created my rpm for Bacula 9.4.1 reading centos srpm spec files. I 
>> made a single package and not split in several packages because this 
>> is my first rpm so I created my spec file taking a cue from bacula-5.3 
>> spec file.
>>
>> All works as intended, an rpm was created and installed without any 
>> not fixable issue.
>>
>> After installing my bacula rpm I run a test to see if all works as 
>> expected. After bacula-dir and bacula-sd configuration I run 
>> bacula-dir -t to check error in config file and get this message:
>>
>> bacula-dir: dird.c:1206-0 Dbdriver field within director config file 
>> "dbi:PostgreSQL" mismatched with the Database argument "PostgreSQL" 
>> passed during Bacula compilation.
>>
>> I don't know what it is referring because I don't pass any argument 
>> like "PostgreSQL" during configure. The only option about postgresql 
>> is --with-postgresql.
>>
>> This is caused by this line in catalog statement:
>>
>> dbdriver = "dbi:postgresql";
>>
>> I tried also using "dbi:PostgreSQL" but I got the same issue.
>>
>> I searched online but found only one fedora bugreport with the same 
>> problem related to fedora29 but for a different bacula version.
>>
>> Over this I tried to run bacula and all works like expected.
>>
>> How I can fix this warning?
>>
>> Hope in help.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Alessandro.
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS at centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> Hi,
> 
> i got only
> 
>    dbdriver = "postgresql"
> 
> in my config file.
> 
> 
> cheers
> 
> Juergen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Hi Juergen,
Sorry, I'm late but I setted dbdriver to postgresql as you and worked 
without any issue.

Thank you for the suggestion.