[CentOS] Scope of classes in CFE 3.10.2 on CentOS 7 [SOLVED]
Meikel
meikel at fn.deFri Jul 12 12:11:09 UTC 2019
- Previous message: [CentOS] Scope of classes in CFE 3.10.2 on CentOS 7
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 173, Issue 5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am 10.07.2019 um 18:07 schrieb Meikel: > Thanks in advance for any help or explanation of that behaviour. Hi folks, yesterday in the IRC I got an answer which explains everything for me, so from my point of view my question is answered and the problem is solved. In short with my words: The bundle scope_of_class_b1 is called one time for each entry in the slist, so it is called three times. The promisee of the "reports" type is "is_dir is SET" and even if the class "is_dir" is set in two of the three executions, the "report" is print out only once, because the promisee is the same, and a promise for the same promisee is only kept/repaired/executed only once in an agent run. To get the expected output the promisee of the "reports" has to be rewritten to become unique for each execution, i.e. adding $(server) like this: reports: is_dir:: "is_dir is SET"; is_dir:: "$(server): is_dir is SET"; !is_dir:: "$(server): is_dir is UNset"; I kept "is_dir is SET" to better show the difference. It gives the following result: # cf-agent -IK --file ./samples/scope_of_class.cf --bundlesequence scope_of_class info: Using command line specified bundlesequence R: is_dir is SET R: ws-1.example.com: is_dir is SET R: ws-2.example.com: is_dir is UNset R: webserver.example.com: is_dir is SET The output "is_dir is SET" is never shown more than once in one agent run, even if all three directories exist, but if the promisee becomes unique, i.e. "ws-1.example.com: is_dir is SET" vs. "webserver.example.com: is_dir is SET" then they're both print out. The problem is NOT, that the definition/evaluation of the class "is_dir" does not work as expected, it works as expected, but I didn't see it in the output, because my expectation of what to see was wrong. As I don't have skills in CFE my wording might be imprecise, I'm sorry, hopefully the idea became clear. Regards, Meikel
- Previous message: [CentOS] Scope of classes in CFE 3.10.2 on CentOS 7
- Next message: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 173, Issue 5
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list