On 06/03/2019 23:03, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 17:50, Phil Perry <pperry at elrepo.org> wrote: >> >> On 06/03/2019 21:53, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 03/06/2019 04:21 PM, Phil Perry wrote: >>>> On 06/03/2019 19:30, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: >>>>> >>>>> That is all good and well, but my problem is that I now can't install >>>>> >>>>> vlc smplayer mplayer, or ffmpeg-libs because they need >>>>> ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7.x86_64from epel. >>>>> I tried to roll back to the previous version via yum history undo but >>>>> previous versions are no longer avaialble. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Do they have a hard coded Requires for the ocl-icd package or just an >>>> auto-generated Requires for the libOpenCL.so lib? >>>> >>>> If it's the former then the packages in epel need fixing. If it's the >>>> latter then the nvidia package will meet that requirement. You can >>>> either force uninstall ocl-icd, or uninstall ocl-icd and any >>>> dependencies, install/update the nvidia packages and then reinstall >>>> the package you require that depend on libOpenCL.so >>> Phil, >>> I don't know if it's a hard coded requires ot auto-generated. >>> Right now I've removed the rpms that need ocl-icd, updated nvidia but >>> when I attempt to install vlc smplayer mplayer, or ffmpeg-libs it fails >>> because it wants to install ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7.x86_64 from epel. >>> I guess that that means that its a hard coded requirement, is that correct? >>> Pete >>> >> >> I guess so. Running 'rpm -q --requires <package>' would tell you. >> >> I only have vlc and ffmpeg-libs installed, and both are installed from >> the Nux repo. Neither are built against libOpenCL.so so I'm not able to >> comment on what epel have done with their packages. >> > > As far as I can tell the packages vlc, smplayer, mplayer, and ffmpeg > aren't in EPEL. I am guessing they are from rpmfusion but could be > from some other repository. > Thank you Stephen. I assumed because they were pulling a dependency from epel that they were also from epel.