On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 7:14 PM Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net> wrote: > Once upon a time, Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> said: > > On Aug 2, 2020, at 14:43, Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk> wrote: > > > You don't have to use UEFI secure booting - most machines can fall back > > > to legacy booting using BIOS settings. If you do that, you won't use > > > any Microsoft signed code. > > > > Back in 2017, Intel said that it was going to deprecate the “Legacy” CSM > by 2020. They might have changed their schedule but I suspect we’ll start > seeing hardware without anything but UEFI. > > I believe that is still Intel's plan. > > However, as happens often, people are confusing UEFI and Secure Boot. > UEFI is a replacement for the ages-old BIOS - Secure Boot is an > extension to UEFI to create a "trusted" (for whatever that may mean) > boot chain to get to the OS. You can have UEFI without having Secure > Boot enabled (that's what I do on my systems). > Legacy BIOS has its own set of issues, like no GPT support, MBR disks are max 2TB. -- -john r pierce recycling used bits in santa cruz