On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, 12:27 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 06:02:37PM +0000, James Pearson wrote: > > why don't they just make RHEL available to all for 'free', and you just > > pay for support if you need it - i.e. a bit like it is now, RHEL if you > > pay, CentOS if you don't - I'm sure that would make everyone happy :-) > > Because RHEL's value proposition is not merely support, and the value of > subscription goes way beyond that. > > Butttttt, that said: yes, this really is the direction things are going > with > expanded access to low-cost/no-cost RHEL. > > -- > Matthew Miller > <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> > Fedora Project Leader > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > They would have saved a lot of bashing of teeth etc if they would have had > all of that ready at the same time so folks could assess where things fall, > right now all we have is RH folks saying something else is coming with no > details, most have kind of lost faith with what's been announced already, > poorly timed IMHO.