Le 10/12/2020 à 00:51, Joshua Kramer a écrit : > There have been hundreds of other messages that describe exactly what > RedHat loses in this deal so I won't go into that here. But branding > oneself as a "bad faith actor" is usually a terrible way to try to > pick up a little bit of subscription revenue. In the end it's going > to be a losing scenario. This is an absolutely UNMITIGATED DISASTER > from a marketing and community goodwill standpoint. Reactions from competent sources all over the world are downright negative. https://linuxfr.org/news/centos-se-saborde-t-elle https://kofler.info/nachruf-auf-centos/ And this petition launched a bit more than a day ago already counts 3500 signatures (and growing fast): https://www.change.org/p/centos-governing-board-do-not-destroy-centos-by-using-it-as-a-rhel-upstream If I was a CentOS developer or a Red Hat employee, a mere glance at the comments would inform me that I've just made a disastrous decision. Even if there *may* be *some* technical merits to it. Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr Mail : info at microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 Mob. : 06 51 80 12 12