On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 01:48:21AM -0700, R C wrote: > I think that Centos, being that close to RHEL, should have had a > licensing scheme for personal use, small business use, just to make > things 'fair'. So, again, please stay tuned. Not for licensing schemes for CentOS, but for programs for these use cases for RHEL. See https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/faq-centos-stream-updates#Q10 and please really do mail centos-questions at redhat.com with your use cases. This is answered by humans designing these programs, not by sales. > I don't think their (IBM/RHEL) course is going to change though, > redhat going "commercial" has been going on for a decade and a half > or so, and it looks like initial investors have a desire > cashing/selling out at this point. I don't think there will be a course change either, but for different reasons. The motivation isn't "cashing/selling out". It's... actually the stated motivation https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/faq-centos-stream-updates#Q2 -- Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader