On 12/15/20 11:07 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:24:03AM -0600, Tom Bishop wrote: >> I know you and other RHEL folks keep saying this about cashing out etc, but >> they could have kept stream and Centos stable at the same time but chose >> not to. Ya know, if it walks like a duck and quacks as a duck...who knows >> maybe this goes down as one of the best decisions ever for RH but I think >> its going to hurt them in more ways then they ever thought about. > As I've also said before, I have no special insight into how RH and the > CentOS board came to this timeline, but I _am_ inclined to believe that the > motivation is the one that they give: they want to focus attention and > resources. yup, I think you are right, they'll pay attention and focus on resources ... > Look at CloudLinux saying that they plan to invest a million > dollars a year WOW!!!! a million a year, that is amazing, that will definitely get things going, with that kind of money you can hire 3 HS students and two college drop outs, that's how MS started too. > into doing their rebuild. It's easy to _say_ "Red Hat could > easily have done both". > >