[CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/
Phelps, Matthew
mphelps at cfa.harvard.eduTue Dec 8 17:02:57 UTC 2020
- Previous message: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/
- Next message: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:59 AM Rich Bowen <rbowen at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 12/8/20 11:29 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > I see a lot of promises that Stream will have better engagement with > > the community. Why would we trust these promises? > > "Better engagement with the community" of course requires that the > community step up and engage. Trust isn't something anyone expects to > just magically happen. > > The whole point of CentOS was so that we didn't have to "engage." We don't have time for that. We just want a stable re-compile of RHEL, as promised. CentOS has been diverging from this for a while (note the change in version names/numbers) and we DON'T WANT THAT! _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- *Matt Phelps* *Information Technology Specialist, Systems Administrator* (Computation Facility, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory) Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian 60 Garden Street | MS 39 | Cambridge, MA 02138 email: mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu cfa.harvard.edu | Facebook <http://cfa.harvard.edu/facebook> | Twitter <http://cfa.harvard.edu/twitter> | YouTube <http://cfa.harvard.edu/youtube> | Newsletter <http://cfa.harvard.edu/newsletter>
- Previous message: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/
- Next message: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list